That's not up to me unfortunately though. :) I'm going to try to
figure out how it's packaged in Faces but it doesn't change the fact
that we'll still need it online. The XML Spec for a schema definition
is a URI and all schema's follow suit. Indeed if I can package the
schema and short-circuit the uri to it then traffic won't be an issue.
I'll still need a place, however to put it up. But I guess I can put
that on the portlet-bridge website. I'll keep you all posted.
Scott
simon wrote:
There must be a way for the portlet bridge to bundle the schema it needs
inside its jar, and "register" it with JSF so that the local copy is
used and not one downloaded from the network.
A library that requires over-the-internet access to its schema in order
to run would be horribly wrong.
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 23:35 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
hrm...
not sure, but isn't the schema not part of the jar?
On Nov 29, 2007 8:41 PM, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey everyone,
The PortletBridge project has a schema that we need to make available
for some of the faces-config extensions outlined in the most recent
spec. I was wondering if making these available on the portlet bridge's
website was sufficient or whether we needed to put it somewhere else.
It has the potential to generate a lot of traffic as validations of the
schema may need to access this file on the website.
Scott
