> I am fine with that, just, I'd change the name "commons" for
> validators/converters/fileupload ....

/commons/
  -/myfaces-validators
  -...
or what ?

> This new project has the potential then to hold the best of
> trinidad/tomahawk/tobago (if possible - think about
> myfaces-XXX-layouters) ... it deserves a better name than just commons, no?
>
> -/myfaces-XXX-tables
> -/myfaces-XXX-ppr

Hrm.. not sure if a *common* PPR is really fine.
Trinidad, for instance doesn't need anything from dojo, so we have our
very simple and lightweight "ajax"-API.
So, adding dojo, as a common mechanism to Trinidad, is not really
something, I am thrilled about.
That would be too much overhead.

but, we can bring this up in the future, current goal is, to just
kickoff the base
of commons.

-Matthias

>
> :-)
>
> Not sure if we have to provide a all-in-one jar than too ... might need
> some maven/xml/faces-config.xml/merger/thingy.
>
> > We don't remove *existing* code from projects like Tomahawk, yet!
> >
> But could be a way .... later ... or ... instead of tomahawk 2.0 ... I
> think!
>
>
> Ciao,
> Mario
>
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org

Reply via email to