Many of us here have said that we don't see the need to support 1.1 for this project. Is there anyone here who feels that we do need to support 1.1 (and why)?
On Dec 5, 2007 12:33 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 5, 2007 6:18 PM, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > here we go; > > > my understanding is, that 1.1 is a must > > > > Why? Is it really necessary for us to create new projects on legacy > > specifications? > > Well "a must" is a bit too much. I think I said that, having Tomahawk > 1.1.x in mind... > But... I really don't care that much on Tomahawk 1.1.x; > > A lot's of parts are pretty independent form the particular version. > Those work out of the box for both versions... > > The other parts, that aren't (such as utils that uses invokeOnComp(), > ExtCtx....) > It is ok to skip faces 1.1 > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > further stuff: > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org >
