[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549965
]
Aino Andriessen commented on TRINIDAD-846:
------------------------------------------
I agree that a reverse filter could be a logical configuration, especially with
all the adf xml and jpx files. And it would be great if the ADF BC wizard bug
would be fixed.
However, the aim of this plugin is to create JDev project files from our maven
pom files so that we can develop our application with JDeveloper, e.g. with ADF
business components (BC). The developers of this plugin have the choice how the
plugin behaves. One of the choices is to use a reverse filter or not. With a
reverse filter a problem arises when working with JDeveloper and ADF BC,
without it the problem does not arise. So with the reverse filter, we have to
make manual changes to the project properties in JDeveloper after using the
plugin, without it we don't.
Although maybe not the ideal solution, the pragmatic way is to not define the
reverse filter in the plugin and follow the IDE's behaviour.
> JDev plugin - compiler configuration 11g
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: TRINIDAD-846
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-846
> Project: MyFaces Trinidad
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Plugins
> Affects Versions: 1.2.5-plugins
> Reporter: Aino Andriessen
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: project.xml.11.1.1.0.0.patch
>
>
> The compiler configuration in the 11g 'template' project.xml file should not
> contains a so called reversed filter, because the JDeveloper ADF BC wizards
> do not take the reverse filter into account.
> This has been fixed (patched) on the 10.1.3.0.4 project file, but not yet on
> the 11g version. The same patch cannot be spplied because the jpr structure
> has been changed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
