And sorry, I do not know sl4j, what do we gain with it? Thanks! Bruno
On 15 Dec 2007 19:26:00 +0100, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > could you explain what we gain from that switch? > > I just see one additional jar as the user has to deal with cl anyway. > > It is the defacto standard. > > Did you consider the java std log facility. Might be as good as sl4j. > A cl adapter might be doable there too. > > > > Mario > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Saturday, Dez 15, 2007 7:12 pm > Subject: Re: [commons] What Logger ? > To: "MyFaces Development" <[email protected]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I think, that Manfredo will also put it into myfaces-core > >:-) > > > >Simon suggested to create a MyFaces Logger, > >but... commons should not depend on that. > > > >(a cool discussion on the hackaton) > > > >-M > > > >On 15 Dec 2007 19:01:00 +0100, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> does this mean EVERY user has to drop in a slf4j jar then? > > Why not stick with cl and those willing to use sl4j drop in the adapter jar? > > > >> > > Mario > > > >> > > -----Original Message----- > > From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Saturday, Dez 15, 2007 5:53 pm > > Subject: [commons] What Logger ? > > To: Reply- "MyFaces Development" <[email protected]>To: "MyFaces > > Development" <[email protected]> > > > >> Hi, > > > > > >I think, I'll use http://slf4j.org/ for the logger in commons. > > > > > >What do you think about that ? > > > > > >-M > > > > > >-- > > >Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > >further stuff: > > >blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > >sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > >mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >-- > >Matthias Wessendorf > > > >further stuff: > >blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > >sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > >mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > > > >
