I like the sub-categories from Manfred's proposal

-M

On Dec 15, 2007 9:45 PM, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also fiddled with the site a few weeks ago... and got stuck.  ;-)
>
> Well here is the outcome of my fiddling:
> http://people.apache.org/~manolito/myfaces-site/
>
> Notice the collapsible menu items. I made them uncollapsed for this
> example, but they should be collapsed on the main page (like on the
> Maven site for instance).
>
> There is a slight difference in the structure.
> According to the nature of the various sub projects there is a
> difference between the core stuff and the component libs. I think it's
> more natural to think of two different projects for the core: "Core
> (JSF 1.1)" and "Core (JSF 1.2)". Both are then divided into API and
> Impl.
> Trinidad on the other hand is one project with two "flavours" JSF 1.1 and 1.2.
>
> There is also a technical issue I would like to propose:
> What about changing the version value of the site pom to "unversioned"
> to reflect the fact that this site "project" will never be deployed or
> released?
>
>
> --Manfred
>
>
>
> On 12/15/07, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok, I've been fiddling with the myfaces site for a bit, in order to clarify 
> > JSF1.1 vs JSF1.2 support.
> >
> > Every page in the "docs" section, except the wiki link needs a different 
> > version for the two JSF versions. Reading the 1.1 version would be really 
> > confusing for someone intending to use 1.2.
> >
> > And many (but not all) of the subprojects need a different home page for 
> > the different versions.
> >
> > Here's a possible restructure of the home page:
> >   http://people.apache.org/~skitching/myfaces-site/
> >
> > Most of the links don't currently work; the distributionManagement section 
> > of the poms in the 1.1 and 1.2 branches would just need to be updated to 
> > match, then new sites for them pushed out.
> >
> > And of course the documentation pages (esp the ones in the JSF12 sections) 
> > would need to be updated. But that needs the restructure to happen first.
> >
> > Comments? Better ideas?
> >
> > Note that AFAIK there is no way for a menu on the left navbar to have a 
> > "submenu".
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Simon
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org

Reply via email to