On Dec 19, 2007 11:31 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I said; no vetos. > but we (Trinidad) got -1 and we were suggested to place them into > META-INF
during incubation; I learned a lot there. Even I was already around Apache years before -M > > That's what the maven-remote-resources-plugin does as well. > > @Leonardo: did you use this plugin? Check the Trinidad profiles, > for the best version; they help a lot. > > I really appreciate this release, since it is very good > (replacement of JARs w/ RI is possible), but I prefer > the files to be in META-INF... > > Perhaps it is only me :-) > > > On Dec 19, 2007 11:23 PM, Grant Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not sure where you're getting your information from. See [1] for > > instructions on where and how to apply license and NOTICE files. > > > > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html > > > > > > > > On 12/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -1 > > > the license/notice files are not located in META-INF > > > but they are in the JAR, that's right. But they should be placed > > > in META-INF. > > > > > > not sure if MYFACES-1790 is a showstopper. > > > > > > -M > > > > > > On Dec 19, 2007 11:11 PM, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I updated the dependency of the mfp to 126-SNAP. > > > > Did you notice that ? > > > > > > > > -M > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 19, 2007 8:49 PM, Leonardo Uribe < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.1 release of Apache > > > > > MyFaces core out. > > > > > > > > > > Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts: > > > > > 1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.shared" v3.0.1 [1] > > > > > 2. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core " v1.2.1 [1] > > > > > > > > > > The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]). > > > > > > > > > > Please take a look at the "1.2.0" artifacts and vote! > > > > > > > > > > Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three > > > > > +1 votes (see [3]). > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > > > > > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits > > > > > [ ] +0 > > > > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be > > released, > > > > > and why.............. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Leonardo Uribe > > > > > > > > > > [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces121 > > > > > [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > further stuff: > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Grant Smith > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > further stuff: > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
