On Jan 5, 2008 10:06 AM, simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Leonard has been struggling with Maven (and I know how he feels). Just
> some misunderstanding I expect.
>
> Unfortunately the files that are in the sync directory on
> people.apache.org are owned by lu4242 (leonard) and have only read
> permissions for group. So no-one but Leonard or root can remove them.

Best wait for him then?  As far as I can tell, it did get enough votes:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--release-for-MyFaces-1.2.1-td14440257.html

At the end, Matthias mentions that it didn't pass the TCK.  I don't
think that invalidates a PMC vote to release, though we are under some
restrictions about calling it an official JSF implementation.  (I"m
not clear on the details here.)

Thoughts?

-- 
Wendy


>
> BTW, this permissions problem appears to be common to many of the dirs
> (files owned by the deployer with only read for group); I guess the
> deploy instructions need to be updated to include how to set fileperms
> correctly.
>
> >
> > > I also see that there is a tag for 1.2.1 in svn:
> > >  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/tags/1_2_1/
> > >
> > > This seems like a bad idea as there is no 1.2.1 release in existence. If
> > > a tag is needed for the release-candidate, then the dir name should have
> > > "RC" in it, and be renamed to the final 1_2_1 name after publication of
> > > the release candidate as an actual release. Does the
> > > maven-release-plugin allow this?
> >
> > It's not a problem for there to be a tag and staged artifacts that
> > never passed a vote.  They just shouldn't be available for download as
> > an official release.
>
> I think it *is* bad for there to be a directory in subversion that
> really looks like a tag for an official release, although the release
> has not happened.
>
> Someone else mentioned that the maven-release-plugin does prompt for the
> tagname to create. So in the myfaces situation, the release manager
> really should add "-rc" on the end of the proposed name, as there can be
> a couple of weeks between the rc being built and it passing the TCK.
> Actually, I would think that it would be better for the release plugin
> to add -rc by default.
>
> Regards,
>
> Simon
>
>

Reply via email to