Because artifacts where published, even if that was not the intent, the
version number should be consider used.
Paul Spencer
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On Jan 21, 2008 1:08 PM, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If something was publicly released as 1.2.1 already, then -- even if
it was pulled -- please do not release 1.2.1 again.
it wasn't released. Just the impl jars made it to public repo.
which is (from the effect) close to a release ;-)
-M
Skipping a version number might cause some questions on the list.
However, reusing a version number will result in the end user not
knowing if they have the "good version" or the "bad version", nor will
anyone who tries to help them debug issues.
On Jan 21, 2008 4:00 PM, Leonardo Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So we agree on 1.2.2?
