Hey Mario, On Jan 30, 2008 10:33 PM, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Leonardo Uribe schrieb: > > Not have code completion and other features on the IDE is a low price > > for we have with templates. > Not that I would like to veto at this point (which I am not able to do, > for sure), but: > > We already gave up some comfort with having the shared stuff. You know, > you can not easily set breakpoints, edit files, compile and retest. You > know, you always have to know in which generated share to set the > breakpoint and then change the core, regenerate etc etc. > > Afterwards, the same counts for the components too. Which means, lets > say, 70% of the code can't be easily debugged, changed, hot-swapped etc. > Given that it is hard already to find open-source developers I am not > sure if all this is engouraging.
I don't think that the template is causing *real* pain, like the shared does. that is a total different beast. In Trinidad (where the comps are in the API-Jar), for debugging, just the source-jar of API is needed, no second jar; like with the shared. I haven't found it annoying to use the way of doing things, like in Trinidad. > > But yes, I do not have any better idea yet. > > Ciao, > Mario > > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
