On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Andrew Robinson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>
> "The specifics of the process may vary from project to project, but the
> 'minimum of three +1 votes' rule is universal."
>
> What happens if there are only 2 members on a team :)

the project may be dead, b/c of no release ;-)

>
> +0 for me as I have never run a portlet server
>
>
>
>  On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Michael (myfaces committer)
> > you (myfaces committer)
> > me (myfaces committer)
> >
> > voted +1
> >
> > that is enough ;-)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > Ahh thanks..  So by my count, I need a half vote more.  Any takers?
> > >
> > >  On Feb 14, 2008, at 11:25 PM, "Matthias Wessendorf"
> > >
> > >
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >  > the binding was a *joke* to the recent tobago release thread.
> > >  > You basically need 3 +1 votes, there is no veto.
> > >  > Oh yes... you need *one* +1 more than -1 votes.
> > >  >
> > >  > 4* +1
> > >  > 3* -1
> > >  >
> > >  > => OK
> > >  >
> > >  > but... not healthy in respect to the community, IMO ;-)
> > >  >
> > >  > -M
> > >  >
> > >  > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >  > wrote:
> > >  >> Hmmm.  2.5. Oh wait, +1 binding.
> > >  >>
> > >  >> On Feb 14, 2008, at 4:06 PM, "Matthias Wessendorf"
> > >  >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >  >> wrote:
> > >  >>
> > >  >>
> > >  >>
> > >  >>> +1 "binding" ;-)
> > >  >>>
> > >  >>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:39 PM, Michael Freedman
> > >  >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>> +1
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>> Kito D. Mann wrote:
> > >  >>>> + .5
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>> I looked at it a couple of weeks ago (tested it with the portlets
> > >  >>>> I'm
> > >  >>>> building on eXo portal), and it looked good to me. I don't have
> > >  >>>> time to try
> > >  >>>> it right now, though :-(.
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >  >>>> Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action
> > >  >>>> http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training, and
> > >  >>>> mentoring
> > >  >>>> http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >  >>>> From: Scott O'Bryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >  >>>> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 4:23 PM
> > >  >>>> To: MyFaces Development
> > >  >>>> Subject: [VOTE] Release of Apache MyFaces Portlet Bridge 1.0.0-
> > >  >>>> alpha
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>> Hi,
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>> I'm trying to get an alpha release of the portlet-bridge out so
> > >  >>>> that
> > >  >>>> projects like Trinidad and other renderkits might be able to begin
> > >  >>>> development and testing on it before the real release. This will
> > >  >>>> allow
> > >  >>>> projects to include the bridge code as a runtime dependency and
> > >  >>>> take
> > >  >>>> advantage of the annotations needed for future testing/
> > >  >>>> development of
> > >  >>>> the bridge.
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>> I was running the needed tasks to get the "1.0.0-alpha" release of
> > >  >>>> the
> > >  >>>> Apache MyFaces Portlet Bridge out. The artifacts are deployed to
> my
> > >  >>>> private Apache account ([1]).
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>> Please take a look at the "1.0.0-alpha" artifacts and vote
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>> ------------------------------------------------
> > >  >>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > >  >>>> [ ] +0
> > >  >>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
> > >  >>>> released,
> > >  >>>> and why..............
> > >  >>>> ------------------------------------------------
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>> Thanks,
> > >  >>>> Scott
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>> [1] http://people.apache.org/~sobryan/portlet-bridge/1.0.0-alpha/
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>
> > >  >>>
> > >  >>>
> > >  >>> --
> > >  >>> Matthias Wessendorf
> > >  >>>
> > >  >>> further stuff:
> > >  >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > >  >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > >  >>> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >  >>
> > >  >
> > >  >
> > >  >
> > >  > --
> > >  > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >  >
> > >  > further stuff:
> > >  > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > >  > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > >  > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org

Reply via email to