On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 08:16 +0100, Mario Ivankovits wrote: > > >> If we find a way how these could work I wouldn't mind if we get rid of the > >> current solution. > > > >Your wish is my command. > > When thinking about it, this one wasn't possible with my solution either. So, > probably lets not put this as high priority on the todo list.
Sorry Mario, I don't understand what you mean here. I thought your earlier email said that you still wanted to be able to configure a Converter on a component by using a nested tag (instead of just using the converter attribute). So yesterday I added a new tag to do this: <orchestra:converter beanName="..."/> It is already tested and added to svn. Is that sufficient, or do you still really want to be able to use the standard f:converter tag to pull in converters from the spring configuration? Regards, Simon
