+1 very good idea! On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yes, +1 on moving dynaform to sandbox. > > the annotation stuff seems stable and there are many people out there > who would like it to see this dings in the official maven repo. > > --Manfred > > > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > >> > 2) release of orchestra-core15-1.0 > > >> > > >> We're working on it, but there's quite a lot of effort still needed. > It > > >> all works (and is being used in production) but needs a lot of > polishing > > >> before a stable API can be declared. Probably a couple of months > away.. > > >> > > > Really months? What do you plan to change/polish? > > > > > As it is now, probably yes. The dynaForm stuff is really a hughe > > code-base needing some thoughts to being sure having a stable api. > > > > What we can think of moving the dynaForm stuff into the Orchestra > > sandbox. Then core15 should be a no-brainer for a release. > > This might make sense as thoughts are to merge the dynaForm stuff with > > another project. I'll kick off a discussion about it soon. > > > > Ciao, > > Mario > > > > > > > > > > -- > http://www.irian.at > Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, > Development and Courses in English and > German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >
-- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
