Hi, joining the discussion very late... but, let me please ask.
is this plugin still working with Trinidad :-) ? -Matthias On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Leonardo Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Andrew Robinson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/MyfacesBuilderPlugin > > > > Is this supposed to be a solution to the code replacement? I don't > > recall any vote to achieve a resolution on how to go about the code > > generation. From what this looks like, it looks worse than the current > > trinidad plugin. Embedding data in javadoc is really awful IMO. > > > > Or am I mistaken and this is just the tomahawk code builder? > > > > This wiki is the idea that Simon proposed for code generation in a more > concrete presentation based on the comments on the mailing list and the > starting code proposed on. > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/myfaces-build-tools/branches/skitching > > Actually, I have worked a lot with myfaces-faces-plugin (older trinidad > build), I have full component generation for tomahawk 1.1 and 1.2 ready for > commit, and really I think that myfaces-faces-plugin is a great tool (clear > wiki, easy to understand and make it work, but sometimes a little bit > complex doing uncommon tasks). If it was my decision, I will continue using > myfaces-faces-plugin, commit tomahawk, upgrade components from sandbox and > release. > > It's clear that all solutions proposed for this issue (Code Generation) > sucks more or less. You're right. There is not a vote about what should be > the direction to take yet, but it's unclear how to manage this (at least I > don't know what to do in this case when some developers thinks very > different). > > suggestions about what to do are most welcome > > regards > > Leonardo Uribe > > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
