hello leonardo, concerning myfaces-commons-sev-en: i don't agree. it's similar if you suggest to merge myfaces-orchestra with myfaces-commons. - in my opinion that's not a good idea. sev-en should stay independent!
+ commons-sev-en sounds strage. :) (the pronunciation isn't [sev] ... [en] - it's like the 7 in english) regards, gerhard 2008/4/4, Leonardo Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I have tried the demo on my workstation, and in my opinion is a very cool > idea and this should be on myfaces :) > > The idea of include with myfaces-commons sounds better that put this on > orchestra (someone could want to use this only). Maybe > myfaces-commons-sev-en. > > regards > > Leonardo Uribe > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Gerhard Petracek < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > hello andrew, > > > > sev-en is completely independent of orchestra or the idea behind it. > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > > > > > 2008/4/4, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Since this is currently supported in Seam and Orchestra is a Seam > > > spin-off/clone, perhaps this should be incorporated into Orchestra > > > instead of yet another project. > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Gerhard Petracek > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > sev-en is a new jsf-extension. > > > > > > > > > > sev-en allows jsf validation with annotations! > > > > > > > > > > some central features: > > > > > - cross-component validation (including cross-entity validation) > > > > > - support for jpa based validation > > > > > - zero configuration > > > > > - extensible (e.g. custom annotations) > > > > > > > > > > you will find some previews (descriptions [1], examples [2] and > > > much more) > > > > > at the sev-en section [3] of my new open source blog. > > > > > > > > > > what's your opinion about this extension? > > > > > > > > sounds interesting. Is that levering the "bean validation" JSR ? > > > > Would be cool to have a little bit more standard oriented > > > validation > > > > "framework". > > > > Otherwise (IMO) that would be just something similar to > > > @Hibernate's validators > > > > (used heavily in Seam) > > > > > > > > -M > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > gerhard > > > > > > > > > > [1] http://os890.blogspot.com/2008/03/new-jsf-extension.html > > > > > [2] > > > http://os890.blogspot.com/2008/04/sev-en-preview-short-example.html > > > > > [3] http://os890.blogspot.com/search/label/sev-en > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > > > Courses in English and German > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > Courses in English and German > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
