Thank you
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Blake Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew, > > I'm sorry that I let this get so out of control. One of my worst faults > (at least according to Gabrielle Crawford, who doesn't know the least of > it), is that I don't +1 the parts that I agree with enough and instead > comment on the parts that I want changed. > > As Gabrielle said once (OK many times), "I'll send a two page plan out for > review and you're only comments will be on these two minor points that I got > wrong". > > To repeat, I'm sorry. > > -- Blake Sullivan > > Andrew Robinson said the following On 4/15/2008 9:01 AM PT: > > > > > I wish to withdraw and clarify the scope of my apology earlier on the > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list regarding my overreaction and emotional > > response to the replies made by Blake Sullivan on the "private / > > protected final methods in renderers" thread. I am just as guilty or > > more guilty in regards to the behaviors exhibited on this thread and > > am not proud of my quick replies and letting stirred up anger > > influence my replies. > > > > I have apologized to Blake over the phone for my part in this > > discussion. I am sorry that I made blanket statements saying that his > > replies were of no help when I simply wanted to say that no concrete > > actions were proposed that could be implemented to address the issue. > > I admit to attempting to cut off the discussion to only the committers > > and developers to purposely block further replies from Blake. This was > > unwarranted, unprofessional and simply a bad way to address the > > problem that was being created in the "discussion" and I should have > > contacted Blake at that time to work out any personal issues I had > > with his replies. > > > > I also overstated that I was being heckled, but instead should have > > said that I did not appreciate that the majority of my points, > > examples, and opinions were being attempted to be shown to be wrong. > > > > Regarding this matter I will attempt to privately work with Blake to > > find a mutual ground where there is a mutual attempt to respect one > > another and to not use blanket statements about one another's > > behavior. I am sorry for my part in all of this and making this open > > source thread turn into something of a soap opera. > > > > I am sorry to all those that I offended my attempting to close the > > discussion, and all those, especially Blake, for anything I have said > > that degrades them in any way whatsoever. > > > > I will make a conscious attempt to not reply too quickly, weigh my > > responses better and deal with email emotions better in the future. > > > > -Andrew > > > > > > > >
