2008/4/25 Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Forgot to ask, this uses annotations for JSF >= 1.2 right?
>
> Also one more question, would Jsf* be better than JSF* for the names
> (ie JsfProperty vs JSFProperty)? Using all uppercase for an acronym in
> a java name is not conventional. Uppercase is usually reserved for
> starting a new, unabbreviated word.


Yes, I have seen this too. The convention on xdoclet is use
namespace.prefix. I would like to use something like this:

oam.Component
oam.Converter
oam.Validator
oam.RenderKit
oam.Renderer
oam.Property
oam.JspProperty
oam.JspTag
oam.JspAttribute
oam.Exclude

or something like that. I would like to see what Simon thinks about this,
since he proposed the names at start and I don't know if he has a particular
reason about the choice of the tags.

Simon: What do you think about this?

On myfaces 1.2 maybe annotations could not be used, because maybe it breaks
the TCK, but I'm not tested this yet, so its a point to take into account.
The actual code allows to use annotations and doclets (we need to update
annotation classes).

regards

Leonardo Uribe


>
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
> 2008/4/25 Leonardo Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi
> >
> > Thanks to all people who voted.
> >
> > We got 7 +1
> >
> > Grant Smith
> > Bruno Aranda
> > Sochor Zdeněk
> > Werner Punz
> > Gerald Müllan
> >  Simon Kitching
> > Leonardo Uribe
> >
> > and one +0
> >
> > Mario Ivankovits
> >
> > So MyfacesBuilderPlugin will be moved to trunk:
> >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/myfaces-build-tools/trunk/maven2-plugins/myfaces-builder-plugin
> >
> > Almost all points taken into accout by Andrew was implemented the last
> days,
> > only this points do not:
> >
> >  5. Ability to generate events and event listeners
> >  6. Ability to add event type properties to components (addXListener,
> > getXListeners, etc.)
> >
> > This points are trinidad specific stuff, so this should be done later.
> >
> > On the wiki I have updated an xml file (inside the doc) that allows the
> > developer to have code completion in the doclets used by the plugin. This
> is
> > a work in progress, so the definition can change in the future.
> >
> > regards
> >
> > Leonardo Uribe
> >
>

Reply via email to