Thanks, Scott; just wanted to be sure that release managers are aware of these issues.
+0 Alexey Scott O'Bryan wrote: > > Yeah, I think in general we need to do a better job of committing patches. > Let me say this though, if you think this is a blocking issue and needs to > be addressed before 1.2.8, then it IS relevant to the release process and > you should vote -1. > > I for one am still voting +1 because although TRINIDAD-1059 is a pretty > straight forward fix, Trinidad has never claimed to be compatible with > non-firefox and ie browsers and I suspect we'd have other issues as well, > especially with skinning. Furthermore some of the client-side javascript > is > based off this agent. > > If you don't think it's important enough to hold up the release, let's > move > this to another thread. > > Scott > > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 4:35 AM, Alexey Stukalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> >> Hi, Scott >> >> Sorry if my comment is not relevant to the release process, just thought >> that resolutions for >> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310661&fixfor=12313041 >> trinidad-1.2.8<http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310661&fixfor=12313041trinidad-1.2.8>issues >> >> might be set prior the release. >> >> Specifically, http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1059 >> TRINIDAD-1059<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1059TRINIDAD-1059> >> is a critical one, and a fix is a trivial one-liner. >> >> Thanks, >> Alexey >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-of-Trinidad-1.2.8-tp17266073p17271827.html >> Sent from the My Faces - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-of-Trinidad-1.2.8-tp17266073p17281740.html Sent from the My Faces - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
