it was my suggestion -> +0.9 reason: maybe a restructuring of component libs as a whole is essential? at the moment: -0.5 (because there are some issues i haven't thought about so far) i think we should discuss it within an alchemy proposal.
i think the main misunderstanding was: we thought alchemy should be the name for your lib: [new sub-project] |_ alchemy |_ ... maybe some other sub-projects fit in myfaces-extensions. e.g. werner mentioned [1] orchestra. however, for me flexfaces and other similar component libs don't fit in myfaces-extensions. ok - i didn't wrote [2] it explicitly... -> no pure component libs. regards, gerhard [1] http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-myfaces-groovy-support-first-pre-alpha-showcase-p17345888.html [2] http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--PROPOSAL--myfaces-extensions-p17474665.html 2008/5/27 Jihoon Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Quick two cents regarding Alchemy. > > As discussed in previous posts and written within the following Wiki > page => http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MyFacesAlchemyProposal, I was > thinking perhaps we have a new subproject named MyFaces Alchemy. > Under this project, there will be component libraries such as > FlexFaces [credit to Zubin Wadia and referral from Hazem Saleh for the > name] which bridges Web 2.0 and other dynamic control solutions to > JSF. > > So for example as discussed in a previous post: > > Alchemy [sub-project] > FlexFaces [bridge of Flex and JSF] > ... > > Thanks!!! > > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Gerhard Petracek schrieb: > >> > >> ok - i'm fine with that. > >> what i mean: there are also other suggestions out there (concerning > >> alchemy) and it's a different kind of project - so let's discuss alchemy > >> later on... > >> > >> regards, > >> gerhard > >> > >> > > Well this is indeed a good question I am working on a Tomahawk extension > > project for dojo myself which will show the first sources in a few weeks > so > > this cuts into the same wood as Alchemy, a set of dynamic controls which > > will need a home once alpha stage is reached. > > The original idea was to add it sort of as tomahawk extensions > > but maybe we can find a common place for all this. > > > > > > Anyway I dont think we should start to discuss that yet. > > > > > > > > -- > Sincerely, > > Ji Hoon Kim > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
