thank you for the information. i know that - it was just because it was a definite pos. vote (inclusive more than 3 pmc votes) -> i kept it short.
-> if really required, i'll do that. regards, gerhard 2008/6/6 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Gerhard, > > Gerhard Petracek schrieb: > > this vote passed with 100 % +1 > > The rule for any vote is that it requires at least 3 +1s from PMC > members in order to pass. Note that votes from committers and users are > an important *influence*. But in the end it is the PMC which has been > appointed by the ASF board as responsible for overseeing the project [1] > > Of course not every issue is an official "vote"; discussions about > architecture, bugfixes, etc are an issue of "consensus" and not a vote, > even though people express themselves as +1/-1. But I think creating a > new sub-project is definitely an official VOTE issue. > > So could you please list the actual votes, and whether the voter is a > PMC member or not? > > [1] On a side note, if anyone knows a committer who has been involved on > a regular basis for a year, and is not on the PMC then I suggest > pointing this out in an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Thanks, > Simon > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
