On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1, but I also agree that it should be put into commons rather than > Tomahawk if there's no limiting factor. > There is one dependency to: org.apache.myfaces.shared_tomahawk.renderkit.RendererUtils Gerhard told me once that some parts of shared should be part of commons utils, doing an api and hide the impl copying shared classes using myfaces-builder-plugin:unpack goal. Another question is where to put it on commons, because there is no myfaces-commons-components module. For now, we have to upgrade it to tomahawk, since the previous ideas need a lot of discussion. > > On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Andrew Robinson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Curious since this guy doesn't actually print any HTML and has no > > renderer if we would rather put it in commons? > > > > I'm okay either way, just thought it would be worth considering. > > > > On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Andrew Robinson > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> +1 > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Leonardo Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >>> Hi > >>> > >>> Checking the code, examples, documentation and previous discussions, > the > >>> functionality of s:limitRendered component is complete, > >>> so we can propose it to be upgraded to tomahawk. > >>> > >>> So please vote in the following way > >>> > >>> [+1] for agreeing with promoting the component to the next Tomahawk > release. > >>> [-1] for disagreeing with promoting the component to the next Tomahawk > >>> release. > >>> > >>> regards > >>> > >>> Leonardo Uribe > >>> > >> > > >
