+1

On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> yes it is enough.
> You need more +1 than -1
> there is no veto in a release.
>
> thanks for getting this rolling.
>
> +1 on the release.
>
> -M
>
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Leonardo Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Leonardo Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Are the votes here enough to release it? If no, any PMC member could
> >> review this bits please?
> >
> > Please, someone who can help me? I don't see any reason to do not release
> > this bits, but I don't want to go against apache rules for voting (we
> live
> > in community!).
> >
> >>
> >> regards
> >>
> >> Leonardo Uribe
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 6:19 AM, Cagatay Civici <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Welcome back Werner! +1
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> +1.
> >>>>
> >>>> BTW, welcome back Werner :-).
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I am back btw...
> >>>>> ;-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Leonardo Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.0.0 release of Apache
> >>>>>>    MyFaces Commons out.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    The artifactId and version number has been changed according to
> >>>>>>    suggestion proposed on previous vote, so now the artifacts
> proposed
> >>>>>>    has this names:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    JSF 1.1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    myfaces-commons-utils11-1.0.0
> >>>>>>    myfaces-converters11-1.0.0
> >>>>>>    myfaces-validators11-1.0.0
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    JSF 1.2
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    myfaces-commons-utils12-1.0.0
> >>>>>>    myfaces-converters12-1.0.0
> >>>>>>    myfaces-validators12-1.0.0
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
> >>>>>>     1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.commons" v1.0.0 [1]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    There is also binary and source packages available at ([3])
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    For more info about this artifacts take a loot at the site on
> >>>>>> ([4]).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    Please take a look at the "1.0.0" artifacts and vote!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of
> >>>>>> three
> >>>>>>    +1 votes (see [3]).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    ------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>    [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> >>>>>>    [ ] +0
> >>>>>>    [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
> >>>>>> released,
> >>>>>>     and why..............
> >>>>>>    ------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    Thanks,
> >>>>>>    Leonardo Uribe
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    [1] 
> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfacescommons100<http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfacescommons100>
> >>>>>>    <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfacescommons100>
> >>>>>>    [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> >>>>>>    [3] 
> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfacescommons100binsrc<http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfacescommons100binsrc>
> >>>>>>    <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfacescommons100binsrc>
> >>>>>>    [4] http://myfaces.apache.org/commons
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed
> >>>>
> >>>> Web blog: http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog
> >>>>
> >>>> [Web 2.0] GMaps Integration with JSF + Apache Tomahawk + JBoss a4j:
> >>>> http://code.google.com/p/gmaps4jsf/
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>



-- 
Grant Smith

Reply via email to