Hi Paul, Thanks for the link, it makes the whole thing clearer. However, is that point still debatable? I quite disagree about the conclusion about forcing the upgrade of the core if you upgrade Tomahawk. Upgrading Tomahawk might force the upgrade of shared, but not necessarily if the former doesn't depend on a latest change to shared. Furthermore you don't need to upgrade core if you upgrade shared if the latter enforce backward compatibility.
Personally I must admit that I don't really like the preprocessing since it means having two of the same class on the classpath but in different packages if you use both core and Tomahawk. Regards, ~ Simon On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Paul Rivera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hi Simon, > > I think this link explains it best: > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Source_Code_Packaging > > Best Regards, > Paul Rivera > > --- On *Sun, 9/28/08, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>* wrote: > > From: Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: MyFaces shared question > To: "MyFaces-Devs" <[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, September 28, 2008, 7:38 AM > > > Hi all, > > Anyone knows why myfaces-shared is unpacked with a plugin by Maven instead > of being a standard dependency? > > > Thanks, > > ~ Simon > > >
