The problem is that Leonardo generates the release-notes for Tomahawk
using a JIRA report. And this appears to be standard practice for many
myfaces projects.
So issues related to the sandbox then get listed in the Tomahawk
"release notes". This confuses users, particularly when a new feature is
added to sandbox and it looks like that new feature got added to
tomahawk. They then wonder why they can't find it (see emails yesterday
in the user list).
So either JIRA issues need to be filed against sandbox, or the
release-notes need to be created in some other way. I think filing jira
issues against sandbox is likely to be the most popular choice. It also
feels to me personally like the *right* choice, particularly as sandbox
components now often get "promoted" into myfaces-commons-* projects
rather than tomahawk.
Regards,
Simon
Manfred Geiler schrieb:
But Sandbox IS a part of Tomahawk and not a single project, so I do
not see the problem here.
Sandbox issues SHOULD be filed using TOMAHAWK and - of course - the
regarding component ("SubForm", "PPRPanelGroup", ...).
-1 for a new Jira project(!)
--Manfred
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any JIRA admins here?
There currently is no JIRA project defined for the myfaces sandbox. It
appears that people have simply been using TOMAHAWK to file bugs against.
But as recent releases has used a jira report as the "release notes" this is
causing confusion.
Can someone please create it? The name SANDBOX is already taken, so perhaps
"MF-SANDBOX" or similar could be used.
Perhaps we should file a jira issue to create the new project? :-)
