i agree with scott.

regards,
gerhard



2008/11/5 Havelka Tomáš <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> +1
>
>                                                 ___ ___
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeanne Waldman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 10:08 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Trinidad] ResponseWriterDecorator - proposal to move to public
> API
>
> Hi there,
>
> I'm wondering what people think about moving ResponseWriterDecorator
> from package org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.io;
> to org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.context (or some other public package - I
> chose context because ResponseWriter is in
> javax.faces.context.ResponseWriter).
>
> The reason I ask is because the ADF Faces project I'm working on has
> quite a few classes that extend ResponseWriterDecorator, some of which
> are public apis.
> And Trinidad itself extends this class in 7 classes.
>
> Also, ResponseWriterDecorator itself does not use any internal apis. It
> only uses public apis, so making it public will be easy.
>
> We can deprecate the internal one for backward compatibility.
>
> Let me know your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeanne
>
>
>


-- 

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Reply via email to