No doubt, I think he's been holding out on us. :)
Kito Mann wrote:
Busy day, Michael? :-)
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Michael Freedman (JIRA)
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-47?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Freedman resolved PORTLETBRIDGE-47.
-------------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
1.0.0
bridge has been modified to pass/ really on the PortletContext to
the FacesContextFactory vs the PortletConfig.
> BridgeImpl pass PortletConfig instance to FacesContextFactory
instead PortletContext
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PORTLETBRIDGE-47
> URL:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-47
> Project: MyFaces Portlet Bridge
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0-alpha-2
> Reporter: Leonardo Uribe
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.0.0, 2.0.0
>
>
> On myfaces portlet bridge (for jsf 1.2) do this
(org.apache.myfaces.portlet.faces.bridge.BridgeImpl line 240):
> try
> {
> // Get the FacesContext instance for this request
> context =
>
getFacesContextFactory().getFacesContext(mPortletConfig, request,
response, getLifecycle());
> It should pass a javax.portlet.PortletContext instance instead,
because this is the expected var here.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
--
Kito D. Mann -- Author, JavaServer Faces in Action
http://twitter.com/kito99
http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training, and mentoring
http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info
+1 203-404-4848 x3
