+1

Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
+1

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Scott O'Bryan <[email protected]> wrote:
Okay, I made the changes to the tag and the trunk and uploaded some new
artifacts.  The NOTICE and LICENSE is now included in all of the files.  I
also removed an extra TLD and did some housekeeping with regard to the
binaries.

Please review and vote.

Scott

Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Scott O'Bryan <[email protected]>
wrote:

Hi,

I'm trying to release the first alpha release of the MyFaces Portlet
Bridge
2.0.0 and am now beginning the formal vote.  This tag represents an early
implementation of a bridge for the Portlet 2.0 specification and is
intended
for testing interoperability with Portlet 2.0 enabled portals to enable
them
to run JSF.  It is important to understand that this is an early alpha
release so api's and implementations may change during the alpha release
cycle.  It is the intent, however, for development of this project to
mirror
the public drafts of JSR-301 as they are released.

Currently there are no demo projects associated with this release.  I'm
hoping to have a simple usecase in place by the beta.

If you have time, please take a look at the current release and give us
your
vote.

You can find the signed release candidate at [1]

------------------------------------------------
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
   and why..............
------------------------------------------------

On "portlet-bridge-api-2.0.0-alpha-javadoc.jar", I don't see a
meta-inf/ notice or license file

-M


Thanks,
Scott

[1] http://people.apache.org/~sobryan/portlet-bridge/2.0.0-alpha/








Reply via email to