I'm +1 with that. On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Werner Punz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello everyone, I just started with the entire ajax layer for MyFaces 2.0. > As it seems, we probably can get away with porting the Trinidad Ajax layer > over. While the code is rather big, it probably is better than writing > another transport layer from scratch. We probably have 1/3rd of code which > we probably could drop but I would keep it in the internal APIs. > > All I would do is to port the trinidad transport layer classes over (The > ajax queue and the XHR transport layer) and push it into the > org.apache.myfaces namespace. > > I think this is the sanest solution to deal with it. The trinidad code is > although a little bit verbose, proven and mostly bug free in this area, and > reusing the trinidad code also would make porting Trinidad over to the new > transports probably a tad easier (although I doubt it because all this is > mostly implementation APIs and the public APIs are rather smallish) > >
