Thanks Scott, it may help, I'll check it out.

~ Simon

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Scott O'Bryan <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think, Simon, that they are talking about allowing this again due to the
> inactivity.  I was going to commit some patches to it for the bridge stuff
> but was told that it may be prudent to hold off.
> It might be time to revisit this discussion.
>
> Scott
>
>
> Michael Concini wrote:
>
>> Thanks.  I understand the issues and that we can't actually build without
>> disabling the tests for now.  The project I work on uses a custom internal
>> build tool, so I need to be able to rebuild outside of Maven.  Right now I'm
>> just looking to sanity check that the new classes can build in our
>> environment without problems.
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> Simon Lessard wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, and we'll have to deal with those Shale test issues. Shale team
>>> seems very reluctant to have a part of its test framework moved to MyFaces
>>> but that create an impossible loophole for MyFaces-API project since our
>>> test depends on them and their test framework cannot be upgraded to 2.0 spec
>>> until a 2.0 jar gets released on the repositories... :(
>>>
>>> ~ Simon
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Werner Punz <[email protected]<mailto:
>>> [email protected]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>    Michael Concini schrieb:
>>>
>>>        Are there instructions available on how to create a source zip
>>>        which includes the generated .java files?  I'm looking to be
>>>        able to create a source zip similar to what you can download
>>>        from http://myfaces.apache.org/download.html.  The only thing
>>>        I've been able to figure out how to get however is the
>>>        snapshot jar which still includes the build annotations in the
>>>        source but not the generated files.
>>>
>>>        Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>>>        Thanks,
>>>        Mike
>>>
>>>    Problem I see is that MyFaces 2.0 is not even close to be used...
>>>    currently I am working against testcases because various aspects
>>>    of the spec are not there yet...
>>>    Heck it wont even compile without switching off the testcases...
>>>
>>>
>>>    :-(
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to