Hello Adonis, I'm very glad to see this -- Trinidad _really_ needs a new demo :-).
--- Kito D. Mann -- Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://twitter.com/kito99 http://twitter.com/jsfcentral http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training, and mentoring http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info +1 203-404-4848 x3 On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Adonis Raduca <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > Almost an year ago a discussion take place regarding the Trinidad skin and > components demo rewriting. > There is also an issue opened on wiki regarding this subject. > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad_MyFaces_Skin_and_Demo_rewrite > > Now I have some time and I want to start to work on this subject ;) > > Because I'm an organized guy I think is better to have a little action > plan. > So I've made this action plan that looks like this: > - components overview (a little investigation on the already existing > components) > - components reclassification (we can improve the already existing > classification of the components) > - Trinidad shining mechanism study (very useful to understand what is > possible what is not) > - components skin design (all stuff regarding the components look and feel) > - skin implementation > - demo site design (components demo application look and feel) > - demo site implementation (if is needed) > > For the beginning I've started with the component overview. > So I made a table with all components and several related information like: > > - component category > - a field that indicate if the component manifests in the visible way (is a > button, a panel ...) or is a invisible one (like the iterator) > - have interactive samples (demos) > - is documented. > - have skinning capabilities. > - have skinning keys documentation. > - a short description of the component > > All these information was taken from Trinidad component demo page: > http://www.irian.at/trinidad-demo/faces/componentDemos.jspx > > Please look in the atached *.xls file. > > So, what do you think about this component overview table and about the > approach in general ? > If anyone find a wrong piece the information and/or posses information that > is not present in this table, can notify me and I will made the required > change. > > > Have a nice day ! > Adonis >
