On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Simon Lessard <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I raised that issue before, but I came to change my mind about the naming > since the spec itself added extra packages including facelets. So, I'd like > to place MyFaces Facelets into package > > org.apache.myfaces.webapp.pdl.facelets > or > org.apache.myfaces.pdl.facelets (since I don't think webapp makes any sense > there)
I agree on not much sense in webapp, however, I'd like to have the packed name: org.apache.myfaces.webapp.pdl.facelets > > to reflect the JSF package javax.faces.webapp.pdl.facelets on the API side. > > Also, in the long run (so not until we pass the TCK and everything more > important was already done), I think we should do the same with the JSP > classes, moving them all to > > org.apache.myfaces.webapp.pdl.jsp > or > org.apache.myfaces.pdl.jsp > > > Which one do you prefer? Or do you have a better suggestion? This is a pretty good idea. Again, I'd go for org.apache.myfaces.webapp.pdl.jsp -Matthias > > > Regards, > > ~ Simon > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
