On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Adonis, > > this is a nice looking skin, much better than the default. > Not sure if the skin really meets the current laf of Web-2.0 apps > but it is indeed much much more sexy than current one. > Thanks for doing this. > > I wonder if you already had a chance to make the demo part of > a real skin, and if yes, how did it go ? > > If we plan to add this, I'd recommend to not make it ASAP the default. > Once the skin is stable we can change the default LAF.
which does NOT mean we should not use it in the demo ;-) Of course, there we want it ;-) > > Thanks again, > Matthias > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Adonis Raduca > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We finished the design phase for Trinidad, so now we have all elements >> designed. >> We also have a demo for Trinidad new skin ;) ... please look in the >> attachment ... >> >> We intent to name this skin Casablanca, like a tribute to the water and the >> sand. >> Accordingly the convention for that interface is: >> - we use a grayish-brown shades for all controls >> - we use water-blue shades for selections for emphasizing >> >> So, that is, ... I hope you like it ... >> >> ciao >> Adonis >> >> P.S. >> Please use Firefox to this demo, I don't invested the time to test and to >> make it work on all browsers for this demo. >> There are only several controls in this demo, but if you want to see more in >> order to have a complete image I can made some screen-shots. >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Adonis Raduca <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Almost an year ago a discussion take place regarding the Trinidad skin and >>> components demo rewriting. >>> There is also an issue opened on wiki regarding this subject. >>> http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad_MyFaces_Skin_and_Demo_rewrite >>> >>> Now I have some time and I want to start to work on this subject ;) >>> >>> Because I'm an organized guy I think is better to have a little action >>> plan. >>> So I've made this action plan that looks like this: >>> - components overview (a little investigation on the already existing >>> components) >>> - components reclassification (we can improve the already existing >>> classification of the components) >>> - Trinidad shining mechanism study (very useful to understand what is >>> possible what is not) >>> - components skin design (all stuff regarding the components look and >>> feel) >>> - skin implementation >>> - demo site design (components demo application look and feel) >>> - demo site implementation (if is needed) >>> >>> For the beginning I've started with the component overview. >>> So I made a table with all components and several related information >>> like: >>> - component category >>> - a field that indicate if the component manifests in the visible way (is >>> a button, a panel ...) or is a invisible one (like the iterator) >>> - have interactive samples (demos) >>> - is documented. >>> - have skinning capabilities. >>> - have skinning keys documentation. >>> - a short description of the component >>> >>> All these information was taken from Trinidad component demo page: >>> http://www.irian.at/trinidad-demo/faces/componentDemos.jspx >>> >>> Please look in the atached *.xls file. >>> >>> So, what do you think about this component overview table and about the >>> approach in general ? >>> If anyone find a wrong piece the information and/or posses information >>> that is not present in this table, can notify me and I will made the >>> required change. >>> >>> >>> Have a nice day ! >>> Adonis >> >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
