Tomahawk already has dojo a huge dependency. For the new lib I'd favor using jquery UI plus stable jquery plugins instead of dojo.
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]>wrote: > not sure I read that article, but I agree that it is worth to go the > Facelets road, for new things. > Not sure if EVERY 2.0 library needs to contain only template-based > components; old-fashion > renderers are still, ok... > > so generally you also think it is worth to host something like that ? > I personally would like to start with this by introducing a wrapper for > jQuery (included via JSF 2.0 resource handling) > > -M > > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Ganesh <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Matthias, > > > > Funny you're asking this today: Last night I've released the J4Fry > > dojoFacelets library on sourceforge. It's a pure JSF template/dojo > library, > > it was build on JSF 1.1/1.2 w/Facelets and it runs on JSF 2.0 out of the > > box. The templates are AJAX enabled via ui:define. The first project > based > > on the new components will be productive around juli in a european bank. > > We've started working on this last autumn after I released this artivle > in > > german JavaMagazin, making the point that future JSF tag libraries must > be > > template based: > > > http://www.j4fry.org/resources/jung_JSF_JavaMagazin_Tag_Entwicklung_mit_Facelets.pdf > . > > The dojoFacelets are apache licensed and we would love to make them a > > starting point for a new MyFaces subproject. > > > > Here's a link to the documentation: http://j4fry.org/dojoFacelets.shtml > > (with links to examples and downloads - the JSF 2.0 example is currently > > offline, check the JSF 1.2 example). > > > > Best regards, > > Ganesh > > > > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> sure MyFaces 2.0 is not yet there, but I want to share an idea... > >> > >> Since JSF 2.0 has the new Facelets support to easily create (custom) > >> components, > >> would it be a good idea to start a new (sandbox) project that defines > >> a JSF 2.0 set > >> of components, only written via the Facelets way ? > >> > >> I had to play with some fancy JS (jQuery) to make a "wow" *easy* > >> component (via Facelets). > >> I think it would be cool to have such a library that provides a kinda > >> wrapper for some JS lib, > >> e.g. jQuery. > >> > >> -Matthias > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >
