Yes, it makes perfectly sense to put in in a different branch, Cheers,
Bruno 2009/7/6 Simon Lessard <[email protected]>: > Hi Michael, > > Personally I think it should be a different branch, I just never created it > because I'm not familiar enough with it. This will also allow addition of > 1.5 features in it so I'm all for it. > > > Regards, > > ~ Simon > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Michael Concini <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> What branch of shared should we be using for JSF 2.0 specific changes? >> Looking at the pom for impl, it looks like right now both 1.2.x and 2.0 >> builds are using the shared 3.0.6 branch. >> I have some changes that will be ready to check in this week that >> following the current implementation should be in the shared sources. >> Specifically I'm referring to the RendererBase classes and ELTagBase >> classes for the new OutcomeTarget components (h:link and h:button). >> If we wanted to maintain the same shared source level for both 1.2 and >> 2.0, I guess I could just put the base classes in the impl somewhere >> instead, but that doesn't seem ideal since it wouldn't follow the same >> pattern as every other component. >> >> Any advice/instruction here would be appreciated. >> Thanks, >> Mike >> >> > >
