Hi 2009/7/29 Simon Lessard <[email protected]>
> Hi, > > Ok it's commited. I tried to add some comments to the code prior to the > commit. Mostly, what need to be done is the implementation of : > > FaceletViewDeclarationLanguage > - getComponentMetadata > - getScriptComponentResource > - getStateManagementStrategy > - renderView also need to be revisited most likely > Thanks a lot Simon. I was waiting for this. > > Various tag handlers requires to be plugged with the delegate pattern (am I > the only one finding that part not incredibly clear?). Anyway, I'll try to > read more on those and at worst check Mojarra a bit and try to contribute on > that. > I have seen it, too. I tried to find documentation but there is very few (almost no comments). I suppose we have to check mojarra source code to see what's the intention of this workaround. > > Theoretically, the Facelet compiler should work with the current code, but > I didn't try it. > I tried run facelets compiler before this commit and it works with small fixes. regards Leonardo Uribe > > > Regards, > > ~ Simon > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Michael Concini <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Great news. Thanks a lot. >> >> Simon Lessard wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'll try to commit that tonight. >>> >>> ~ Simon >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Michael Concini >>> <[email protected]<mailto: >>> [email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Simon, >>> >>> I wanted to do a quick follow up here. There are a few of us who >>> are ready to start filling in the gaps once the initial commit is >>> done. Have you had a chance to look into committing what you have >>> so far yet? Any ETA on when you might be able to do that so we >>> can get started? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Mike >>> >>> >>> Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >>> >>> hey simon, >>> >>> is it possible to commit your current stuff ? Once it is kinda >>> visible, >>> others could provide the missing bits. >>> >>> -Matthias >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Simon >>> Lessard<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm trying to work on it, but frankly I'm overloaded >>> beyond what I was >>> expecting so I could use help quite badly. Theoretically, >>> three parts >>> remains to the integration: >>> >>> 1. Link the Facelets code with the Delegate pattern on API >>> side; >>> 2. Finish the Facelet VDL (Facelets compiler integration) >>> 3. Adjust some classes (should be minor, mainly regarding >>> delegates that >>> could have been handled in 1) >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> ~ Simon >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:46 AM, Matthias Wessendorf >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Leonardo >>> Uribe<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> Just a small question: What is the status of >>> facelets integration?. >>> After >>> review the work done at this time in myfaces core >>> 2.0.x, facelets >>> integration code are becoming most critical. The >>> remaining points listed >>> below: >>> >>> - Facelets PDL >>> - Client behavior API (depends from facelets and >>> composite component >>> stuff) >>> - Error handling API (and run through existing >>> classes to make sure the >>> new >>> exception specification is enforced) >>> - Partial view API >>> - Partial State Saving (pending integration with >>> facelets) >>> - New tags (mostly linked to Facelets) >>> >>> depends in one way or another with facelets. It is >>> safe to work on it or >>> there is some unknown code to be committed? I want >>> to contribute in this >>> >>> I think Simon has some facelets-related code. >>> >>> >>> area but it could be good to know which parts >>> needs help and what things >>> are >>> done to prevent duplicate work. >>> >>> regards >>> >>> Leonardo Uribe >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
