oh, yes. I will add a new version :-) Thanks for the feedback!
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> wrote: > the goal is not only to make it running with JSF 2.0; > the goal is to support JSF 2.0 features w/in Trinidad. > > -Matthias > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Martin Kočí <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm using trinidad with mojarra 2.0. These are steps to get trinidad >> compiled and running on JSF 2.0: >> >> 1) Since 2.0 all method on wrappers are public. In this case it is: >> - org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.application.StateManagerImpl - >> make getWrapped public >> - org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.application.ViewHandlerImpl - make >> getWrapped -> public >> >> Those changes are backward compatible with 1.2. >> >> >> 2) Make NavigationHandlerImpl child of >> javax.faces.application.ConfigurableNavigationHandler >> >> >> 3) Use javax.faces.context.ExternalContextWrapper instead of >> ExternalContextDecorator >> >> and make changes: >> - SessionSerializationChecker - add method getWrapped >> - XmlHttpPortletExternalContext -add method getWrapped >> - OverrideDispatch - add method getWrapped >> - ClearRequestExternalContext - add method getWrapped >> >> >> 4) Use Facelets API from javax.faces instead of com.sun.... >> >> >> >> I'll create patches - can you add version 2.0 to JIRA please? >> >> >> Matthias Wessendorf píše v Čt 08. 10. 2009 v 10:24 +0200: >>> Hello Andy, >>> >>> I created the "experimental" branch on this location: >>> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/branches/trinidad-2.0.x >>> >>> >>> Greetings, >>> Matthias >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Andy Schwartz <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > Gang - >>> > >>> > I am interested in taking a closer look at Trinidad/JSF 2.0 >>> > integration. I suspect that there are other folks who are interested >>> > in this as well. Would it be possible to create a Trinidad branch for >>> > JSF 2.0-related work? For the moment, I think that an >>> > experimental/sandbox-type branch that we could use for prototyping >>> > purposes would be helpful/would facilitate collaboration on this >>> > effort. >>> > >>> > Thoughts? >>> > >>> > Andy >>> > >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
