Got a response from Ed Burns: <ed> This is a well documented and understood shortcoming of the Resource Handling system. We will address it in 2.1. </ed>
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Grant Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > I prefer the spec's way. I would hate to have to have the resource > identifier as part of each file in the library.. Imaging naming hundreds of > .gif files. This way it's just part of the directory name. > > The properties file is just one file per locale, so that's not such a big > deal. > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I am reading SPEC 2.6.1.3 and I am not sure on the localePrefix... >> >> Imagine I am using a "library" in the $WEB_ROOT/resources >> so the USA, the resourceIdentifier would be like: >> en_US/mycorp/cool.gif >> >> and for Germany, it would be: >> de_DE/mycorp/cool.gif >> >> I wonder why it was done this way ? >> >> For the properties files, they syntax is following this schema: >> >> Messages_en_US.properties >> Messages_de_DE.properties >> >> Perhaps I am not really understanding the benefit of the JSF 2.0 >> resource handling, but >> why shouldn't a "library" contain multiple images (etc), like: >> >> /mycorp/cool_de_DE.gif >> /mycorp/cool_en_US.gif >> >> -Matthias >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > -- > Grant Smith > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
