+1 On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Gabrielle Crawford <[email protected]> wrote: > thanks! > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1653 > > Gabrielle > > Martin Koci wrote: >> >> Max Starets píše v Út 01. 12. 2009 v 20:42 -0500: >> >>> >>> Gabrielle, >>> >>> I think the main advantage of using application view cache is that state >>> saving/view root caching is done once for a particular page >>> within an application (that only applies to pages displayed in response >>> to a GET request). >>> >>> Since we have seen some issues with the current implementation, I would >>> vote for not supporting application view cache >>> in Trinidad 2. Partial state saving should make its benefits much less >>> tangible. >> >> Yes, I did some profiling few moths ago before we migrated to JSF 2.0 >> state saving and I can confirm that same very complex view written: >> >> - as .jspx + trinidad state saving + trinidad components + application >> view cache >> - and as .xhtml + mojarra partial state saving + base JSF components >> doesn't have performance problem (even no regression with .xhtml) in >> both cases regarding state saving. +1 for removing application view >> cache in trinidad 2.0 >> >> Regards, >> >> Martin Kočí >> >> If there is demand for this feature in the future, >> >>> >>> we can revisit it and try to address the issues we have seen. >>> >>> Max >>> >>> >>> >>> Gabrielle Crawford wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm working on state saving issues in Trinidad 2 (for JSF 2). I'm just >>>> wondering if we really want to support application view cache going >>>> forward. >>>> >>>> The application view cache has some limitations that make me wonder how >>>> commonly it's used, see the doc under "The Application View Cache" >>>> >>>> http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad/trinidad-1_2/devguide/configuration.html >>>> >>>> Maybe more importantly, I'm not sure, but I think the reason it exists >>>> is to avoid rerunning the tags? Is rerunning tags as much of an issue with >>>> facelets? If not, maybe we should just say to move to facelets in 2.0. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Gabrielle >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >
-- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
