A more div-related layout would be _REALLY_ great. Maybe we can do this in tomahawk 2.0.
2010/1/6 Cédric Durmont <[email protected]> > Excuse me to sneak in the conversation, but may I suggest that this > html5 renderkit could be an opportunity to write a "table-less" > renderkit, relying more on CSS ? I think this could lead to lighter > html pages (with the default renderkit, you quickly end up with 5-10 > nested tables without doing anything special) and easier/more flexible > skinning... > > > > 2010/1/6 Jakob Korherr <[email protected]>: > > That's a really, really good idea, Matthias! > > And I also think that it should be for MyFaces 2.0 only. > > > > Regards, > > Jakob > > > > 2010/1/6 Michael Kurz <[email protected]> > >> > >> Sounds like a very good idea to me. I guess html 5 will gain in > importance > >> in the not so far future. > >> > >> regards > >> Michael > >> > >> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: > >>> > >>> Hi guys, > >>> > >>> running into this document: > >>> http://diveintohtml5.org/forms.html > >>> > >>> I started playing with some of the new widgets in my Chromium browser > >>> (I wasn't aware that spinbox/sliders are part of > >>> HTML5). > >>> > >>> What about trying to find someone for a GSoC project, to add a (raw) > >>> HTML 5 renderkit? Bernd and I talked about > >>> a potential renderkit last time we saw each other, but now there is > >>> actually some (raw) support on it inside of some > >>> browsers... > >>> > >>> Why not introducing an <hx:***> namespace that could contain stuff as > >>> the following: > >>> -<hx:inputRangeSlider> > >>> -<hx:inputColor> > >>> -<hx:whatEverNewWidgetIsPartOfHTML5 /> > >>> > >>> And/or some more functional stuff, like drag-and-drop: > >>> -<fx:dragAndDrop...> (could be done as a behavior) > >>> > >>> etc. > >>> > >>> What do folks think about that? > >>> > >> > > > > >
