Hi Bernd,

Ok, the problematic code will be removed asap. There is still an
alternate approach there, which was used first, formatting source code
with https://jhighlight.dev.java.net/. This can easily replace the JS
based formatting. Do you see any issues with using jhighlight? we
don't distribute any code of it, just have a dependency to it.

Sorry for any inconvenience.

regards,
Catalin

On 1/28/10, Bernd Bohmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi catalin,
>
> The apache license and the gnu public license are not compatible from the
> asf side. It would be safe to remove the gpl code.
>
> Regards
>
> Bernd
>
> 28.01.2010 13:52 schrieb am "Catalin Kormos" <[email protected]>:
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> This JS library "SyntaxHighlighter"  is used to format code, and its
> license is GNU either version 3 or later:
>
> "SyntaxHighlighter is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
>  it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published by
>  the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
>  (at your option) any later version."
>
> The apache 2.0 license seems to be compatible with it as shown here:
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/licence-FAQ.html#GPL
>
> Based on this I was thinking there is no issue with this, if I was
> wrong we will get rid of commited code which requires that GNU
> license. So it's for sure a no go?
>
> thanks,
> Catalin
>
> On 1/28/10, Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> wrote: > As far as I see
> it this is "only" some...
> --
> ------------
> Codebeat
> www.codebeat.ro
>


-- 
------------
Codebeat
www.codebeat.ro

Reply via email to