txs Jan-Kees!

In fact, I did first svn add those files (and even more) and then tried to svn 
commit parts of it.

The problem is that I have the following structure

svn add src/test/java/org/apache/.../test/
with the following files TestA, TestB, TestC

and I only like to commit TestA. but 
svn commit svn add src/test/java/org/apache/.../test/TestA

but got the following error:
svn: 
»/home/msx/develop/java/apache/myfaces/extensions/cdi/trunk/core/api/src/test/java/org/apache/myfaces/extensions/cdi/core/test/api«
 ist weder unter Versionskontrolle noch Teil einer Übertragung, dennoch ist 
sein Kind 
»/home/msx/develop/java/apache/myfaces/extensions/cdi/trunk/core/api/src/test/java/org/apache/myfaces/extensions/cdi/core/test/api/projectstage«
 Teil einer Übertragung

This looks pretty much like a SVN error, or I did something wrong.

Usually I can work around with first svn commit -N those directories, but in 
this case svn status didn't even showed me which parts are missing because it 
'cleans' recursive directories from the output.

I now commited all in one big go, but this somehow is not very beautiful.

LieGrue,
strub


--- Jan-Kees van Andel <[email protected]> schrieb am So, 4.4.2010:

Von: Jan-Kees van Andel <[email protected]>
Betreff: Re: How do you partition SVN commits in myfaces
An: "MyFaces Development" <[email protected]>
Datum: Sonntag, 4. April, 2010 14:06 Uhr

You could try to "svn add" everything (but not commit it), and then only commit 
some files/directories.
The issue is probably that you can't commit individual files, because the 
parent directory isn't versioned. "svn add"-ing the parent tree should fix it.

Regards,Jan-Kees


2010/4/4 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>

this would perfectly work in git (where it otoh would not be necessary at all 
since the original problem just doesn't exist), but creating branches in SVN as 
workaround for this nifty little checkin problem seems to me like shooting 
birds with atom bombs.




Honestly, maintaining feature branches in SVN is even more broken than simple 
checkins. And in SVN you don't have much correlation between a file in a branch 
and a file in trunk. In SVN a branch and trunk are simply just different 
directories which don't know much of each other.




LieGrue,

strub



--- Mike Kienenberger <[email protected]> schrieb am So, 4.4.2010:



> Von: Mike Kienenberger <[email protected]>

> Betreff: Re: How do you partition SVN commits in myfaces

> An: "MyFaces Development" <[email protected]>

> Datum: Sonntag, 4. April, 2010 13:13 Uhr

> I'm not an expert on svn so I can't

> answer your specific question, but

> if you can't find a solution, you could commit everything

> to a branch,

> then merge to trunk individually.

>

> On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 7:08 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]>

> wrote:

> > Hi!

> >

> > I have a really fu.... SVN problem.

> >

> > I did a lot changes to EXTCDI, and wrote a few tests.

> >

> > Now I don't like to commit the whole core/src/test in

> one commit but split it into single commits to match the

> Jirs issues.

> >

> > But once I svn add core/src/test, I cannot commit the

> files beneath it independently because whenever I try to

> commit solo files beneath the tree, I always get a SVN

> failure "this file is not currently under SVN control" which

> is completely wrong as svn status clearly showes a 'A'.

> >

> > So, am I now forced to commit the whole soup in one

> big checkin?

> > This did even work in CVS...

> >

> > oki, any tips out there how to resolve this issue?

> >

> > LieGrue,

> > strub

> >

> >

> > __________________________________________________

> > Do You Yahoo!?

> > Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen

> herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.

> > http://mail.yahoo.com

> >

>



__________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen 
Massenmails.

http://mail.yahoo.com





__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen 
Massenmails. 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to