+1

On 15 April 2010 11:00, Werner Punz <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ok now we have found the problem I am reverting back +1 from my side since
> it is not a code problem and hence does not affect the generated jars as a
> bug, but please the final core
> should be buildable without having to checkout test-beta3 etc...
>
>
> Werner
>
>
>
> Am 15.04.10 10:34, schrieb Werner Punz:
>
>  Ok here it goes officially -1 until we have resolved the issue upon
>> looking at the test, the test is ok and tests correctly, the code
>> causing the test fail is at fault.
>>
>> That should not happen for a release.
>> As I have posted in another mail I currently have to serve a customer
>> if no one else is able to fix it in between I will have a look late
>> in the afternoon.
>>
>>
>> Werner
>>
>> Am 15.04.10 07:37, schrieb Werner Punz:
>>
>>> Before I am giving my vote here, there is still a unit test failure ...
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 15.04.10 06:39, schrieb Matthias Wessendorf:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for running this
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPod.
>>>>
>>>> On 15.04.2010, at 03:48, Leonardo Uribe <[email protected]
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  +1
>>>>>
>>>>> 2010/4/14 Leonardo Uribe < <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.0 release of Apache
>>>>> MyFaces core out.
>>>>>
>>>>> Minor fixes were done since the latest proposed artifacts
>>>>> (MYFACES-2658, MYFACES-2659 and MYFACES-2660), so we can
>>>>> continue with the vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
>>>>> 1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.shared" v4.0.1 [1]
>>>>> 2. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core" v2.0.0 [1]
>>>>> 3. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.test" v1.0.0-beta-3 [1]
>>>>>
>>>>> The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and
>>>>> [3] for binary and source packages).
>>>>>
>>>>> The release notes could be found at [4].
>>>>>
>>>>> Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
>>>>> myfaces-api.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please take a look at the "2.0.0" artifacts and vote!
>>>>>
>>>>> Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three
>>>>> +1 votes (see [3]).
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
>>>>> released,
>>>>> and why..............
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces200>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces200<http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces200>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [2]
>>>>> <http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes>
>>>>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [3]
>>>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces200binsrc>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces200binsrc<http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces200binsrc>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [4]
>>>>> <
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12314890
>>>>> >
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12314890
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12314890
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to