As you can see in my black box tests with Mojarra, the behaviour is different in both implementations. In the base ResponseWriter class, they don't do anything in the startCDATA method and throw an undocumented exception in the endCDATA.
In both implementations of the base class, they throw an exception if the startCDATA method is called and it had been called already... I don't quite understand our implementation of the PartialResponseWriterImpl. We do buffer nested CDATAs and write them when closing the parent one? This would still create nested CDATAs... I still need to understand this bit properly, Cheers, Bruno On 22 July 2010 13:58, Bruno Aranda <[email protected]> wrote: > yeah, sorry, my problem was running only the API tests :) > > Bruno > > > On 22 July 2010 13:48, Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > so, maybe there are now regressions? >> > >> > hrm. have you done some testing? >> >> Ah, the discussion is on the JIRA.. >> >> please run tests, before committing ;-) >> >> > >> > -M >> > >> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> sounds right. >> >> >> >> does blame say more why it does not do nothing? >> >> >> >> It is also kinda strange since the TCK was successfully executed for >> >> 2.0.0 and 2.0.1; >> >> >> >> -Matthias >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Bruno Aranda <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> Having problems with Primefaces again I have realised that something >> was >> >>> working with Mojarra, but not with MyFaces. Again, is the >> >>> ResponseWriter.startCDATA stuff which Primefaces invokes directly on >> its >> >>> main phase listener. >> >>> >> >>> However, reading the javadocs: >> >>> >> >>> >> https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/2.0/javadocs/index.html >> >>> >> >>> It says that method "should take no action when invoked"... which >> means >> >>> that it should be completely empty as far as I understand. If that was >> the >> >>> case, we would get the same behaviour in both implementations... >> >>> >> >>> Cheers, >> >>> >> >>> Bruno >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Matthias Wessendorf >> > >> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > >
