Somehow I think there was already work/discussion about it, based on a Tomcat interface. It for sure does bring back some fragile memory. Let me think...
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, looking at the RI is for sure not OK. > > I didn't see a problem with the previous provided links (the JBoss > code), however > I have not opened any of the provided links yet. > > -Matthias > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:54 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> That's OK. I guess I can do the SPI implementations on my end but it might >> not make it into JBoss AS6 GA. Let's concentrate on the MyFaces SPI's for >> now. How does MyFaces handle the SPI's like Mojarra has? I'm sure it's OK >> to look at Mojarra code since it's GPL2, right? If not, you can look at >> JavaDoc. We need something similar to: >> >> com.sun.faces.spi.InjectionProvider >> https://mojarra.dev.java.net/source/browse/mojarra/trunk/jsf-ri/src/main/java/com/sun/faces/spi/InjectionProvider.java >> >> com.sun.faces.spi.AnnotationProvider >> https://mojarra.dev.java.net/source/browse/mojarra/trunk/jsf-ri/src/main/java/com/sun/faces/spi/AnnotationProvider.java >> >> Stan >> >> Quoting Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]>: >> >>> At Apache we can not have code that contains (L)GPL code; or depends on >>> it. >>> >>> We had discussion(s) about this in the past. The below link contains >>> references >>> to other (Apache) documents: >>> >>> http://markmail.org/message/qtc4g6vsracgzbok >>> >>> -Matthias >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Jan-Kees van Andel >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Great news! It would be very nice if JBoss ships with MyFaces 2. This >>>> also >>>> opens up possibilities to do some enhancements to increase developer >>>> productivity in JBoss, like better resource reloading and so on. Or doing >>>> some things more efficient by plugging into the JBoss infrastructure. >>>> Just >>>> thinking out loud... :) >>>> >>>> One thing about the JBoss SVN link Stan sent. I took a quick peek at the >>>> license header in a Java file and saw that it's LGPL licensed. AFAIK, >>>> this >>>> is not compatible with ASL, so I suggest to not look at the code while >>>> implementing the stuff Stan asked for. >>>> >>>> WDYT? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Jan-Kees >>>> >>>> >>>> 2010/8/5 Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> Hello Stan, >>>>> >>>>> welcome back. We do understand that you can not make any promise on that >>>>> topic. >>>>> The fact that some folks at JBoss are thinking about shipping MyFaces >>>>> (as an alternative option) >>>>> is a good news for this entire community here. Especially it is a >>>>> great motivation for the >>>>> folks that did the main work on ensuring Apache MyFaces 2.x is a great >>>>> success. >>>>> >>>>> On the missing pieces: I am sure that there will be some interested in >>>>> working on them. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>>> PMC Chair Apache MyFaces >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:42 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > Hi guys, >>>>> > >>>>> > Would you like to see MyFaces Core ship with JBoss AS6? If so, read >>>>> > on. >>>>> > >>>>> > If you've been around MyFaces awhile, you probably remember that >>>>> > JBoass >>>>> > AS >>>>> > used to ship with MyFaces instead of Mojarra. It was regrettable, but >>>>> > at >>>>> > the time Mojarra was far ahead spec-wise and the powers that be >>>>> > decided >>>>> > my >>>>> > time would be better spent integrating Mojarra instead of improving >>>>> > MyFaces. >>>>> > >>>>> > However, with JBoss AS6 M4, this is no longer an "either or" >>>>> > proposition. >>>>> > Both MyFaces and Mojarra can live side-by-side. The application can >>>>> > decide >>>>> > which implementation to use: >>>>> > http://community.jboss.org/wiki/JSFonJBossAS6 >>>>> > >>>>> > What's more, changing the default JSF implementation for AS6 is just a >>>>> > matter of changing the defaultJSFConfig property in an XML file. >>>>> > >>>>> > I've talked internally at JBoss about adding MyFaces to the JBoss AS >>>>> > community distribution. Some were for it, and some were very, very >>>>> > for >>>>> > it. >>>>> > Nobody so far is against it. >>>>> > >>>>> > The good part is that I don't think it's a lot of work. It's probably >>>>> > just >>>>> > three or four classes that implement SPI's that I'm guessing MyFaces >>>>> > already >>>>> > has. >>>>> > >>>>> > So this is where the MyFaces Dev group comes in. MyFaces Core 2.0 >>>>> > will >>>>> > run >>>>> > OK on JBoss AS6 right now. However, there is some integration work >>>>> > that >>>>> > is >>>>> > needed for full JEE5 and JEE6 compliance. We need: >>>>> > * An injection provider SPI similar to Mojarra's >>>>> > com.sun.faces.spi.InjectionProvider. >>>>> > * The JBoss/MyFaces implementation of the SPI. I expect this will be >>>>> > very >>>>> > similar to >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > org.jboss.web.jsf.integration.injection.JBossDelegatingInjectionProvider. >>>>> > * An AnnotationProvider SPI similar to Mojarra's >>>>> > com.sun.faces.spi.AnnotationProvider. >>>>> > * A JBoss/MyFaces implementation of the SPI similar to >>>>> > org.jboss.web.jsf.integration.config.JBossAnnotationProvider. >>>>> > * A ServletContextListener class to call for initialization. I expect >>>>> > this >>>>> > will extend from MyFacesServletContextListener and be very similar to >>>>> > org.jboss.web.jsf.integration.config.JBossMojarra20ConfigureListener. >>>>> > >>>>> > If MyFaces Dev decides to take this on, then the code will probably >>>>> > live >>>>> > at >>>>> > Apache and I'll bring it into JBoss AS using Maven. I don't have time >>>>> > to >>>>> > write and maintain the code myself but I'm happy to help out with >>>>> > guidance >>>>> > and to do some refactoring of my code to make this easier. BTW, the >>>>> > JBoss/Mojarra integration code lives here: >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/jboss-jsf-int/trunk/jboss-faces/ >>>>> > >>>>> > Lastly, let me say that I can't make hard promises right now. I don't >>>>> > know >>>>> > if someone at JBoss/RedHat will come along and nix the idea. However, >>>>> > even >>>>> > if we can't ship MyFaces you will have all the integration points >>>>> > ready >>>>> > and >>>>> > have an easy way to "drop in" MyFaces whenever you want to use it with >>>>> > JBoss >>>>> > AS. >>>>> > >>>>> > WDYT?? >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>>> >>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
