[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12906906#action_12906906
 ] 

Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-1906:
-------------------------------------------

I would vote that this is not a bug, and should not be fixed for Trinidad 2. 
f:ajax is a JSF tag, not a Trinidad tag and we should not have to support it 
with respect to client validation in JSF 2.0 for the following reasons.

I would say that we should wait for JSF 2.1 where, hopefully, the EG puts in 
API hooks to allow users to perform client side validation during a JSF ajax 
request. It was commented for JSF 2.0 that such a hook should exist and the EG 
dropped the ball on it and it was not included into the spec.  

A work around is to use the Trinidad APIs to submit the request. I would say 
that we could provide a tr:ajax that would be supported or we could hijack the 
f:ajax tag handler, although I would hesitate to do that as it would make 
Trinidad not "play nice" with other JSF libraries.

I do not feel that replacing the JSF request function is a good choice as we 
ought not to be messing with the JSF internal code if we can possibly help it.

> Client Validation igonred with <f:ajax> tag
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TRINIDAD-1906
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1906
>             Project: MyFaces Trinidad
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0.3-core
>            Reporter: Matthias Weßendorf
>
> Have a form like:
> ...
>     <tr:form....>
>       <tr:panelFormLayout>
>         <tr:inputText id="ajax" label="Field 1:">
>           <f:ajax event="change" />
>         </tr:inputText>
>         <tr:inputText id="ppr" label="Field 2:" required="true">
>         </tr:inputText>
>       </tr:panelFormLayout>
>     </tr:form>
> ...
> Go to field1, type and TAB out:
> => An ajax request is queued and send down to the server
> In Trinidad (with autosubmit, instead of f:ajax) you'd see a warning that 
> "Field 2" is required

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to