+1
Am 13.01.11 19:21, schrieb Michael Freedman:
Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project
and a distributable has been built and is hosted on:
http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/
<http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/>.
The zip has been verified to ensure its download allows one to build/run
the TCK via maven. I also verified that the NOTICE/LICENSE exists and
are included in the various .wars that get built as part of
building/running the TCK.
Please revote on this new distributable:
------------------------------------------------
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
and why.............
On 1/12/2011 2:00 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
Hi
Checking the distributables, I have seen that there is no LICENSE /
NOTICE on the parent folder or in META-INF folder. Is that correct?
In comparison, the files for portlet bridge 2.0
(portlet-bridge-2.0.0-src-all.zip) does have it.
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2011/1/12 Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release
procedure?
MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this..
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
> Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge
2.0.0 TCK.
> This is the final version of the JSR 329 TCK and corresponds to
Portlet
> 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was
> finalized/approved by the JCP last month.
>
> Note: The TCK is designed to be built and run directly from the
maven
> project. Because of this users are pointed directly to the
subversion tag
> associated with version of the TCK:
>
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr329-1.0.0
>
> Hence there are no repository artifacts built or hosted.
However, for
> convenience we do provide a downloadable version of this project
>
> These components can be inspected in
>
http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/
<http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/>
>
> I have verified that the distributables can be expanded and the
TCK can be
> built/run from this. In addition I have verified the contents in the
> subversion tag.
>
> Please review these materials and vote.
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
released,
> and why..............
>
> Thanks,
> -Mike-
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
