i was talking about the layout. regards, gerhard
http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2011/2/4 Jan-Kees van Andel <[email protected]> > Hey, > > What do you exactly mean with style? The layout-style or the code-style? > But sure, I can use any style I guess. > > I still need to commit the first version, but it's hard to dedicate time to > this stuff, since it's not work related for me, but I'm gonna commit it > this/next week, even though it's far from finished and doesn't yet conform > to my personal quality standards. But then at least it's committed. > > /JK > > 2011/2/3 Gerhard <[email protected]> > > hi jan-kees, >> >> some weeks ago i extracted our basic style for our demos at apache-extras. >> it would be great if the real-world example uses the myfaces-style as well. >> btw. it might be a good idea to bundle the resources -> we could release >> it and all demos just use it as dependency. >> >> regards, >> gerhard >> >> http://www.irian.at >> >> Your JSF powerhouse - >> JSF Consulting, Development and >> Courses in English and German >> >> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> >> >> >> 2010/11/28 David Jencks <[email protected]> >> >> >>> On Nov 28, 2010, at 4:50 AM, Jan-Kees van Andel wrote: >>> >>> Hey, >>> >>> Dunno how this OWB config creeped in. I guess I copy pasted the wrong >>> openwebbeans.properties into the project. It's empty now. >>> >>> CODI is also in now and I'm starting to use it, but since I have been a >>> bit CODI-ignorant lately, I guess I'm not using it to it's full extent. >>> >>> About Bean Validation, we could also use ExtVal in combination with BV to >>> support more advanced use cases, but I'm not going to add it until I need >>> it. When committed, anyone can add this stuff... >>> >>> About BVAL, I didn't use it because it's still incubating and I'm not >>> looking forward to debugging all kinds of crazy integration issues. I want >>> to keep focus on delivering an app and maybe afterwards migrate it to BVAL. >>> What's the current state of the library? >>> >>> >>> BVal works great in geronimo 3 and has been passing standalone tck for >>> months and generally the in-geronimo tck issues have not been with bval but >>> problems with other integrations such as OWB. >>> >>> For maximum portability (?) at least "officially" you might target the >>> app to a javaee 6 web profile container which would include servlets, jsf, >>> web beans, bean validation and ejb 3 lite already. Or you might try >>> packaging it in two ways, one as a web profile app and one as a servlet app >>> with all the extra support included in the war. >>> >>> david jencks >>> >>> >>> BTW, it's not a *real* real-world app (it's not running in production for >>> a client). I'm not allowed to do that. But it's more an example of how it >>> could look like. >>> >>> Are you all okay with my idea to commit it into a sandbox? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Jan-Kees >>> >>> 2010/11/27 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >>> >>>> big +1 for the real world app >>>> >>>> > useOwbSpecificXmlConfig=true >>>> >>>> This will be _completely_ removed from OWB in the very near future! This >>>> has been the 'old' XML config from the original webbeans spec. >>>> >>>> I'd also suggest to use Apache bval instead of hibernate validator as >>>> JSR-303 impl. This is also the default impl OpenJPA uses by in it's tests. >>>> >>>> >>>> LieGrue, >>>> strub >>>> >>>> --- On Sat, 11/27/10, Gerhard <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> From: Gerhard <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: Real world MyFaces 2.0 webapp >>>> To: "MyFaces Development" <[email protected]> >>>> Date: Saturday, November 27, 2010, 6:01 PM >>>> >>>> hi, >>>> the "codi issue" you saw happens due to an owb config bug >>>> (see org.apache.webbeans.useOwbSpecificXmlConfig=true) >>>> imo we should just use portable features. >>>> >>>> >>>> regards,gerhard >>>> >>>> http://www.irian.at >>>> >>>> Your JSF powerhouse - >>>> JSF Consulting, Development and >>>> Courses in English and German >>>> >>>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2010/11/27 Gerhard <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> >>>> hi, >>>> we could also use it for extval, codi,... tests. >>>> regards,gerhard >>>> >>>> http://www.irian.at >>>> >>>> >>>> Your JSF powerhouse - >>>> >>>> >>>> JSF Consulting, Development and >>>> Courses in English and German >>>> >>>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2010/11/27 Jan-Kees van Andel <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hey folks, >>>> Somewhere in the past I started working on a real world example webapp. >>>> I guess it's already a year ago. :-) But now I have some free time to work >>>> on this again. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Currently I use MyFaces 2.0 (of course), OpenWebBeans and OpenJPA 2.0. I >>>> also use Hibernate Validator. I got a strange error with CODI, so I skipped >>>> it for now to stay up-to-speed, but I guess we should get that one in. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> My goal with this example app was to bridge the gap between the current >>>> set of example apps and the real world issues that application developers >>>> struggle with.It could also be a nice example of a joint effort between >>>> multiple Apache projects, which would be good for the professional image of >>>> Apache. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> So, this example app has a pretty big domain model, security, layered >>>> architecture, etc. Also stuff like logging, caching and performance is >>>> being >>>> taken care of, so people can compare their app with this one. And this app >>>> can serve as a living documentation in which the answers to Frequently >>>> Asked >>>> Questions can be found. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2 things:1 Since everybody has a different idea of what a "good" app >>>> looks like, I expect a lot of discussions on the mailing list. But I think >>>> this is a good thing, because those discussions are also valuable for >>>> developers. Based on those discussions, they can choose the proper solution >>>> for their context. Those discussions can for example be referenced from the >>>> source code. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2 Where to put the code? My idea for now was to create a top level >>>> "sandbox" directory within MyFaces because this clearly indicates that it's >>>> a work in progress and outsiders shouldn't look at it yet. But then at >>>> least >>>> it's in Apache version control. I can also put it into GoogleCode or >>>> GitHub, >>>> but I prefer Apache, because I think more people will find it there. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Status:I currently have a working app with some pages. I want to write >>>> some additional pages before I commit it. Of course every line of code may >>>> be subject to discussion, but I prefer concrete discussions based on >>>> working >>>> code. That's why I'd prefer a bigger initial commit, incl. a Wiki page with >>>> architectural decisions etc. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Wdyt? >>>> Regards,Jan-Kees >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
