+1 On Mar 10, 2011, at 4:05 PM, Pavitra Subramaniam <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for the current approach :). > > Pavitra > > On 3/10/2011 2:34 PM, Andy Schwartz wrote: >> I am thinking that I will roll with my current approach since we can >> always transparently implement FacesWrapper later if we decide that >> this is an important thing to do. If anyone thinks that it is >> important to do this now, please let me know! >> >> Thanks, >> Andy >>
