yup, sorry for taking so long, but Bernd is right, which means a -1

e.g. 
api/src/main/java/javax/portlet/faces/annotation/BridgeRequestScopeAttributeAdded.java

This needs to get fixed before we can ship it.

you can check this yourself by simply invoking


$> mvn rat:check

There might be single files which could be excluded from the scan, but overally 
it works very well.

LieGrue,
strub


--- On Fri, 3/18/11, Bernd Bohmann <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Bernd Bohmann <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 3.0.0
> To: "MyFaces Development" <[email protected]>
> Date: Friday, March 18, 2011, 9:33 AM
> Hello Michael,
> 
> i performed a checkout of
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/core/tags/3.0.0-alpha/
> and I found many files without a license header.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Bernd
> 
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Michael Freedman
> <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Reminder -- if you are intending to vote please do so
> by mid-day Friday
> > (PST) as I want to close the vote before the weekend.
> >     -Mike-
> >
> > On 3/16/2011 1:12 PM, Michael Freedman wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > FYI ... I plan to close the vote on Friday. 
> Hopefully I will have some more
> > votes to record by then.
> >    -Mike-
> >
> > On 3/15/2011 9:30 AM, Michael Freedman wrote:
> >
> > Here is the information you want -- however I don't
> really want to hold this
> > release until MyFaces/Trinidad are released -- rather
> can't we use this
> > release as pressure to wrap up releases in these other
> projects so they
> > follow shortly?
> >
> > Have folks been waiting to vote because of Scott's
> e-mail -- if so I would
> > appreciate your vote so I can close/release this.
> >
> > Trinidad JIRA:
> >  TRINIDAD-1996 (Status Fixed 1/26/11)  I believe
> this fix is in Beta-2 but I
> > haven't tried it yet and another member of the team
> reports other problems
> > with using beta-2.  I need to investigate more....
> >
> > MyFaces JIRA:
> >
> > MYFACES-3064: Fixed 3/1/11  Fix Version:
> 2.0.5-SNAPSHOT
> > MYFACES-3045: Fixed 3/1/11  Fix Version:
> 2.0.5-SNAPSHOT
> > MYFACES-3042: Fixed 2/15/11  Fix Version: Unresolved
> -- patch available
> > MYFACES-3039: Fixed 2/18/11  Fix Version:
> 2.0.5-SNAPSHOT
> > MYFACES-3038: Fixed 2/18/11  Fix Version: 2.0.4
> > MYFACES-3017: Fixed 2/9/11  Fix Version: 2.0.4
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > MyFacesJIRA:
> >
> > On 3/10/2011 5:50 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> >
> > Hey Mike, do we have JIRA tickets for the Trinidad
> patches needed?
> >
> > Also, what are the challenges with the MyFaces
> core?  I, for one,
> > would like to see this fixed ASAP..
> >
> > On Mar 9, 2011, at 4:53 PM, Michael Freedman
> > <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet
> Bridge 3.0.0-alpha.
> > This is the alpha version of the Portlet Bridge for
> JSF 2.0.  It includes
> > all the base function of JSR329 updated to run in a
> JSF 2.0 environment.
> > Some, though not all JSF 2.0 features are
> expressed/utilized.  Most
> > significant is Ajax support and Composite Component
> suppport.  Note:  this
> > version of the bridge will not work with any currently
> released versions of
> > MyFaces (try Trunk) and only mostly runs on released
> version of Mojarra
> > (patches available).  Likewise a patched version
> of Trinidad is needed to
> > run the TCK (for those tests that depend on
> Trinidad).
> >
> > Distributable components can be inspected in
> > http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge/3.0.0-alpha
> >
> > Repository artifacts are at:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-006/
> >
> >
> > I have verified that the distributable jars run and
> pass the updated version
> > of the JSR 329 TCK.  In addition I have verified
> that the distributable
> > examples run (on apache tomcat/pluto).
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the
> bits
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits
> not to be released,
> >    and why..............
> >
> > Thanks,
> >  -Mike-
> >
> 



Reply via email to