[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13009036#comment-13009036
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on PORTLETBRIDGE-191:
---------------------------------------------
Yeah, I'm not sure why we would want a Factory/finder implementation for the
BridgeConfig. It's not like every object in the API needs to be retrieved
though a factory. In general, only main classes that are overridable should be
retrieved in my opinion.
> Proposal for 3.0 API: javax.portlet.faces.config.BridgeConfig and associated
> BridgeConfigFactory
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PORTLETBRIDGE-191
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-191
> Project: MyFaces Portlet Bridge
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: General
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0
> Reporter: Neil Griffin
> Assignee: Michael Freedman
>
> This interface defines a contract for getting portlet bridge configuration
> values.
> Please refer to the following classes for this proposal:
> http://svn.portletfaces.org/svn/portletfaces/bridge/portletfaces-bridge-api/trunk/src/main/java/org/portletfaces/bridge/config/BridgeConfig.java
> http://svn.portletfaces.org/svn/portletfaces/bridge/portletfaces-bridge-api/trunk/src/main/java/org/portletfaces/bridge/config/BridgeConfigFactory.java
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
